Legal Opinion

Aeroquip-Vickers v. CIR

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 20, 2003No. 01-2741Published

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Aeroquip-Vickers v. Commissioner No. 01-2741 ELECTRONIC CITATION:

2003 FED App. 0370P (6th Cir.)

File Name: 03a0370p.06 _________________ COUNSEL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ARGUED: Frank P. Cihlar, UNITED STATES FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, APPELLATE SECTION, _________________ TAX DIVISION, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas V.M. Linguanti, BAKER & McKENZIE, Chicago, Illinois, AEROQUIP-VICKERS, INC. AND X for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Frank P. Cihlar, Joel L. SUBSIDIARIES, f/k/a Trinova - McElvain,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API