Legal Opinion

People v. Varuzzi

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Randall T. Eng, J.

In a case of apparent first impression, the People have asked this court to hold that “speedy trial” protection, pursuant to CPL 30.30 (1) (a), does not apply to the above-named defendants who, though not accused of an offense defined in Penal Law §§ 125.10, 125.15, 125.20, 125.25 and 125.27, are nevertheless joined in an indictment charging their two codefendants with, inter alia, murder in the second degree.

Absent a clear and sufficient showing by the People why the court should deviate from the unambiguous language of the statute in question, this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. CortesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HockCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2011
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API