People v. Clary
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
The-defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, averred to have been perpetrated at the city and county of San Francisco, by forcibly, violently, etc., taking from one Maria Schaefer the sum of five hundred dollars.
At the trial the prosecuting witness, Maria Schaefer, had detailed the particulars of having drawn money from the Hibernia Bank in the presence of defendant, of her placing it in a satchel, and she related how she went to Silver Street by the street-cars; how defendant followed *60and knocked her down; how she held to the satchel, and he struck lier again and got the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moran v. AbbeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Administrator of Hopkinson v. SteelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
- Jackson v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. DavisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- State v. LuhanoNevada Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. UrrutiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.