State v. Luhano
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Washoe County; W. H. A. Pike, Judge. Savatore Luhano and Servanti Davis were convicted of robbery, and from the judgment and an order denying motion for new trial, defendants appeal. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Norcross, C. J.:
Appellants were convicted in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Washoe, of the crime of robbery. From the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, they appeal.
The first contention made by appellants is that the indictment is insufficient to charge the offense of robbery. The *279indictment, after entitlement, reads: "The defendants, Savatore Luhano and Servanti Davis, above named, are accused by the grand jury of the County of Washoe, State of Nevada, of a felony, to wit, committed as follows,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ShulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- McDaniel v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
- State v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Darrell DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Cross, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Litteral v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Hawthorne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. SwitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.