Legal Opinion
People v. Davison
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 9, 1995No. A064478PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, P. J.
Herbert N. Davison appeals from his conviction for robbery. He contends that the trial court committed instructional error. We agree that the instructions were erroneous. However, we find that the error was harmless, and affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On the evening of February 10, 1993, Charlotte Rosebrough drove to a bank in Berkeley, parked her car in the bank’s parking lot, and went to one of the bank’s automatic teller machines (ATM). After inserting her card in the ATM, she “punched in Rapid Cash $40.” While Rosebrough was waiting for the ATM to dispense…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. BordelonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. AndradeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. MoreheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. FlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. MagallanesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.