Legal Opinion

STEWART EX REL. HILL v. Kralman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 2011No. CV061650; A140040PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Plaintiff was severely injured while riding his snowmobile on defendant’s land. Plaintiff appeals a judgment that dismissed his negligence action on summary judgment on alternative theories. First, the trial court concluded that defendant was immune from liability under ORS 105.682(1) because plaintiffs injuries arose out of his use of defendant’s land for a recreational purpose. Second, the trial court determined that, pursuant to ORS 105.696, if plaintiff was on defendant’s land closed to the public, he was a trespasser and defendant only owed plaintiff a duty not to injure him by willful…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. AcremantOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hansen v. COHENOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cain v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  2. STEWART EX REL. HILL v. KralmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API