Legal Opinion

Craighead v. Missouri Pac. Transp. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1952No. 14475PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLET, Circuit Judge.

The only question presented on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence of negligence to support the jury’s verdict for damages resulting from a highway accident. After verdict the trial court -carefully considered the evidence and concluded that there was no substantial evidence upon which the jury’s verdict could be based and sustained a motion for a judgment in favor of defendant notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court further ordered that in the event the judgment notwithstanding the verdict was reversed, that defendant’s alternative motion for a new…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Egan Chevrolet Co. v. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. Bona v. Thomas Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Blytheville v. DoudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Fort Smith Gas Co. v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Roark Transportation, Inc. v. SneedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mo. Pac. Trans. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Rita E. Shaw v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  3. Kisor v. Tulsa Rendering Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  4. Peggy Ann Morfeld v. Dennis J. Kehm, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Jefferson County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Thompson v. LilleheiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API