Legal Opinion

Home Insurance Co. New York v. Rose

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1953No. A-3853PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley

The decision of this case turns on the construction of a paragraph of a policy by which petitioner, Home Insurance Company, New York, insured respondent, Joe M. Rose, against loss or damage to his growing cotton by hail. If one construction is given, respondent is entitled to recover $2700.00; if the other construction is given, he is entitled to recover $1350.00. The trial court’s judgment for $2700.00 was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, 255 S.W. 2d 238. ■ .

On June 6, 1951, respondent made application for the policy in the amount of $4500.00, with a ten per cent deductible clause,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunter, Evans & Co. v. LaniusTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. East Texas Fire Insurance v. KempnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baldwin Motor Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of Hartford v. WimberlyTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Acme Life Ins. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. A. L. Myrick, D/B/A Market Produce CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. In Re Neutral Posture, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. Pitcock v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API