Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1998No. 1577-96, 1578-96PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

*507OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Opinion of the Court · WomackWomack, Judge

in which MeCORMICK, Presiding Judge, and MEYERS, MANSFIELD, KELLER, PRICE and HOLLAND, Judges, joined.

The issue in these cases is whether a search warrant that directs that it be returned “within three days, exclusive of the day of its execution,” may be executed on the fourth day after the date of issuance. We hold that it may.

On November 5, 1993, a magistrate issued a combined search and arrest warrant, which directed:

HEREIN FAIL NOT, BUT HAVE YOU THEN AND THERE THIS WARRANT WITHIN THREE DAYS, EXCLUSIVE OF THE DAY OF ITS EXECUTION,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. New York v. RoseTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Blackmon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  3. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. Bills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Rogers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  3. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Ex Parte CampbellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Haynes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API