Miller v. Waddingham
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Bernardino County.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNE, C.
This was a suit for an injunction to restrain the defendants from removing six buildings from the plaintiff’s land, and for damages for injuries sustained in that regard. The trial court gave judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals upon the findings. The findings show the following case: The plaintiff, who was the owner of two blocks of land in “Ontario Colony,” and of half of the streets in front thereof, made a contract to sell the land to the defendant’s assignor, who entered into possession, and paid the sum of $9,000 “on said contract.” While in posses*376sion he…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Merritt & Bourne v. Judd & ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Vail v. WeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- De Arguello v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Fratt v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Kelso v. UlrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945