Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1950No. Docket Nos. S.F. 17952, 17953PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

In two petitions for writs of review the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company attacks two virtually identical orders of the Public Utilities Commission prescribing the terms on which Pacific may contract with the American Telephone and Telegraph Company for certain services. Although the two orders grew out of separate rate proceedings, they involve identical issues and may be treated as one.

American owns 87.93 per cent of the capital stock of Pacific. The commission found that American dominates Pacific and that the contract between the two, whereby Pacific paid one per cent of its gross…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API