Legal Opinion
Tompkins v. Buttrum Const. Co. of Nevada
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1983No. 13463PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant owns a residence in an elite section of Las Vegas commonly known as Rancho Circle. Adjacent to his property is unimproved property owned by Elizabeth Wells. The properties owned by appellant and Wells, together with all other parcels in Rancho Circle, are subject to the following restrictive covenant:
That portion of the ‘Total Area’ West of State Highway No. 5-C shall be used for single residential purposes only and shall not be subdivided into lots or building sites of less than forty thousand (40,000) square feet. No building shall be constructed upon the premises Westerly…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- South Shore Homes Ass'n v. Holland Holiday'sSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Gladstone v. GregoryNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Collins v. GoetschHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Western Land Co. v. TruskolaskiNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Lindner v. WoytowitzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Kalenka v. TaylorAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- B.B.P. Corp. v. CarrollAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Fink v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.