Legal Opinion
Herrin v. Tri-State Environmental, LLC
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided September 30, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00077Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM HERRIN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 22-77 TRI-STATE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC, SECTION: T(3) SEADRILL AMERICAS, INC., AND BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO. ORDER Before the Court are a Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff, William Herrin (“Herrin”)1 and a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant, Tri-State Environmental, LLC (“Tri-State”),2 both concerning the status of Herrin as a seaman under the Jones Act. For the following reasons, the motion to remand is GRANTED, and the motion for summary judgement is DENIED. FACTUAL BACKGROUND In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Thais Carriere, Widow of Samuel Carriere, Iv, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. PapaiSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jethro Barrett v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., E.B.B. Co., Inc. And Lift Barge, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- David Burchett and Cheryl Burchett v. Cargill, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Equipment Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.