Legal Opinion

Broussard v. Sabine & East Texas Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1891No. 3014PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Jefferson. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Ford. The opinion contains a statement.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge.

This is a suit for damages against defendant in error for so negligently constructing its roadbed as to overflow plaintiff’ s pasture lands by damming up the water in a bayou in time of floods.

There are several items of damage in the petition, to each and all of which the court below sustained special exceptions, because remote and not the correct measure of damages. The assignments of error call upon us to examine the items and decide whether the court’s rulings were correct or not. Plaintiff was using the land for pasturage. In his first count for damages he says the water…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WitteTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Sabine & East Texas R'y Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. ChittimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Hughes v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PrudeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. City of Corpus Christi v. McMurreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API