Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Harrison County. Tried below before Hon. W. C. Buford.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, Chief Justice.

—Appellant’s line of railroad ran east and west on an embankment three or four feet high, constructed for the purpose along the south boundary line of a tract of land, containing nine acres, belonging to appellee. The. natural lay of the land, appellee contended, caused it to drain south and southeast. When appellant constructed its roadbed in 18— it left an opening about twenty-eight feet long in the embankment, and across the opening constructed a bridge or trestle. The opening so left was sufficient as a passway to the south side of its track for all the water…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Trinity & Sabine Railway Co. v. SchofieldTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Sabine & E. T. R'y Co. v. JoachimiTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Clark v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. HuttonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Donaldson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Vestal v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. City of Waco v. RookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API