Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. United States Department of Justice
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge:
Title 28, chapter 154 of the United States Code (“Chapter 154”) permits the “fast-tracking” of federal habeas cases for capital prisoners from states that offer competent counsel to indigent capital prisoners during state postconviction proceedings. See 28 U.S.C; §§ 2261-2266. “Fast-tracking” principally affects habeas corpus petitioners because it contracts from one year to six months the period in which petitioners may file a timely federal habe-as petition. See id. § 2263(a). Before a state can avail itself of Chapter 154’s “fast-tracking” provisions, it must…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Lower E. Side People's Fed. Credit Union v. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- (HC) Rodriguez v. FisherDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Afaisen v. LamorenaSuperior Court of Guam · 2018
- Ambrose v. CainDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.