Legal Opinion

Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. United States Department of Justice

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 23, 2016No. 14-16928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

Title 28, chapter 154 of the United States Code (“Chapter 154”) permits the “fast-tracking” of federal habeas cases for capital prisoners from states that offer competent counsel to indigent capital prisoners during state postconviction proceedings. See 28 U.S.C; §§ 2261-2266. “Fast-tracking” principally affects habeas corpus petitioners because it contracts from one year to six months the period in which petitioners may file a timely federal habe-as petition. See id. § 2263(a). Before a state can avail itself of Chapter 154’s “fast-tracking” provisions, it must…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Lower E. Side People's Fed. Credit Union v. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. (HC) Rodriguez v. FisherDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  4. Afaisen v. LamorenaSuperior Court of Guam · 2018
  5. Ambrose v. CainDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API