Legal Opinion
United Truck Rental Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Kleenco Corp.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided December 10, 1996No. 15883PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ACOBA, Judge.
We hold Defendant-Appellant, Kleenco Corp. (Kleenco), the renter of a truck from Plaintiff-Appellee, United Truck Rental Equipment Leasing, Inc. (United), was liable to United under the terms of a rental contract for the retail market value of the truck and for United’s loss of use of the truck after it was stolen from Kleenco. We also hold that the trial court (court) properly allowed a witness not listed in United’s pre-trial statement to testify in rebuttal.
Accordingly, we affirm the court’s October 15, 1991 judgment (the judgment) except for the court’s award for loss of use…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Davis v. M.L.G. Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
- Waugh v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Cho Mark Oriental Food v. K & K InternationalHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Luke v. Gentry Realty, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Sprague v. California Pacific Bankers & Insurance Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Alaska Construction Equipment, Inc. v. Star Trucking, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. Real Property Located at Incline VillageDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.