Legal Opinion

A. Rifkin Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1978No. Appeal, No. 55 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The A. Rifkin Company (Rifkin) has appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which vacated a referee’s decision to deny benefits to the claimant, Joseph Sevitski, and remanded the case to the referee for further consideration consistent with the Board’s opinion.

While working at his desk as a plant manager for Rifkin, Joseph Sevitski suffered what was later diagnosed as a heart attack. Mr. Sevitski filed a timely claim petition and was afforded a hearing before a referee. The referee dismissed the petition after finding as a fact that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. BowenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. L & S Tasta Pizza, Inc. v. LundyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Speight v. BurensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Blough v. Three S Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API