Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adkins v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1977Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge Breitel (dissenting).

I dissent, and vote to reverse and reinstate the complaint.

The "saving clause” of subdivision 3 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law then applicable, and before its most recent amendment in 1976, provided in relevant part: "that if service of such notice be made within the period prescribed by this section, but in a manner not in compliance with the provisions of this subdivision, such service shall be deemed valid if such notice is actually received * * * and such party against whom the claim is made shall cause the claimant or *353any other person…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. A. & B. Service Station, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Desroches v. CaronNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Melisi ex rel. Melisi v. Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API