Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Casseleggi

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, C.

This was an action of ejectment, commenced on the 2nd day of November, 1873, to recover a parcel of ground on Third street in block 63 of the city of St. Louis, containing a front of thirty-two and a half feet on Third street, by a depth of fifty-four feet. The defendants filed separate answers, putting in • issue the plaintiff’s title, and denying all joint possession or occupancy, and setting up the defense of the statute of limitations. Pauline Dalton, in her answer, avers that she is the owner of the lot of ground; that she rented the south half to Casseleggi, and the north half…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fosgate v. . the Herkimer Manufacturing and Hydraulic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Keene v. BarnesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  3. Sutton v. CasselleggiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Walsh v. VarneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. McDowell v. LittleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Corporation v. AlcornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Hall v. FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Hunter v. WethingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Thomas v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Rutledge v. RutledgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API