Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Rutledge

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.—lion. Robert M. Foster, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.

This is a divorce proceeding. The appeal is from two separate orders of the court al*471lowing the defendant wife alimony pendente lite and snit money. Plaintiff instituted his suit for a divorce, charging numerous indignities on the part of the wife which are averred to have rendered his condition in life intolerable. The defendant wife filed her motion for alimony pendente lite and suit money. On this motion, evidence was taken in the circuit court. It appears therefrom that the parties were husband and wife and had been married twenty-three or twenty-four years. They have two children, a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Turner v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Farmers Exchange Bank v. HagelukenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Penningroth v. PenningrothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Sutton v. CasseleggiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hood v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  2. Graves v. WoodenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Noll v. NollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. McKenzie v. McKenzieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Bill v. BillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API