Legal Opinion

Fosgate v. . the Herkimer Manufacturing and Hydraulic Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1855PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] An objection was raised by the defendants, to wit, that they occupied distinct parcels of the premises claimed in severalty, and that the court erred in refusing to require the plaintiffs to elect against which of the defendants they would proceed.

It is distinctly alleged in the complaint that the Herkimer Manufacturing and Hydraulic Company set up and pretend to have a legal title to the premises, and that the other defendants are tenants in possession of the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. . HepburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Farwell v. Importers & Traders' National Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Sutton v. CasseleggiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Gibbons v. MartinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1877
  5. Ames v. HarperNew York Supreme Court · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API