Levine v. Hans
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMART, Presiding Judge.
This appeal presents issues related to the concept of “surprise” as used in Rule 74.06 of the Supreme Court Rules. Bernard B. Levine, Steven Karbank, Neil Karbank and Roberta Jacobs appeal from an order granting a *359motion for relief from judgment filed under Rule 74.06. Appellants claim that the trial court erred in granting the respondents’ motion for relief from judgment because: (1) neither the law nor the facts permitted any finding of surprise within the meaning of Rule 74.06; (2) laches barred the action; and (8) grounds for equitable relief did not exist. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Baratti v. BarattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Cotleur v. DanzigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Hamm v. HammMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Ribbons v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schuchmann v. Air Services Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Love v. Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rukavina v. SpragueCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Chao Vang v. Cher'ron BarneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Elam v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.