Legal Opinion
United States v. Watchmakers of Switzerland Information Center, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 26, 1959PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
I will first dispose of the Government’s motion which was argued on October 19, 1959, which sought an order, pursuant to Rules 36 and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. that—(1) the authenticity of all documents, which were the subject matter of the Government’s request for admissions dated September 11, 1959, be deemed admitted ; or(2) the defendants Longines and Wittnauer give further answers to said request, unequivocally admitting or denying the authenticity of the documents; or(3) the defendants Longines and Wittnauer be assessed at this time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Syracuse Broadcasting Corporation v. Samuel I. Newhouse, the Herald Company, the Post-Standard Company and Central New York Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Micro-Moisture Controls, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Rabjohn v. Minute Maid Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
3Cited by15 opinions
- United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Diederich v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
- Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- United States v. New Orleans Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.