Rabjohn v. Minute Maid Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff for an order either striking defendant’s responses to plaintiff’s request for admissions served pursuant to Rule 36(a), 28 U.S.C.A., and establishing, as admitted, the facts set forth in the request, or directing defendant to serve an amended response in compliance with Rule 36(a).
I do not deem it necessary to review, in detail, the request for admissions and the responses served thereto. There is not before me any objections to the request, as is provided for in Rule 36(a). Thus, the propriety of the request is not in issue. Similarly,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States Plywood Corp. v. Hudson Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Watchmakers of Switzerland Information Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Aetna Loan Company v. Apache Trailer SalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- United States v. New Orleans Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1966
- Baltimore Aircoil Co. v. York Division, Borg-Warner Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967