Vendrella v. Astriab Family Ltd. Partnership
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
This case concerns natural propensities of a class of domestic animal. The plaintiffs, Anthony Vendrella and his son, Anthony John Vendrella, 1 appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, the Astriab Family Limited Partnership and Timothy D. Astriab. 2 They claim that the court improperly concluded that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the defendants had notice of a horse’s propensity to bite. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Mindful of the procedural posture of the case, we set forth the following facts as gleaned…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- White v. LeederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Peterson v. EichhornMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Arnold v. LairdWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- City of New Haven v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Monti v. WenkertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vendrella v. Astriab Family Limited PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Vendrella v. Astriab Family Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Vendrella v. Astriab Family Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014