Legal Opinion

Vendrella v. Astriab Family Ltd. Partnership

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 21, 2012No. AC 32735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

This case concerns natural propensities of a class of domestic animal. The plaintiffs, Anthony Vendrella and his son, Anthony John Vendrella, 1 appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, the Astriab Family Limited Partnership and Timothy D. Astriab. 2 They claim that the court improperly concluded that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the defendants had notice of a horse’s propensity to bite. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Mindful of the procedural posture of the case, we set forth the following facts as gleaned…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. White v. LeederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Peterson v. EichhornMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Arnold v. LairdWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. City of New Haven v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Monti v. WenkertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vendrella v. Astriab Family Limited PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. Vendrella v. Astriab Family Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
  3. Vendrella v. Astriab Family Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API