Legal Opinion
Morrison v. Sentence Review Division of the Superior Court
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 10, 2004No. AC 24310PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The pro se plaintiff in error, Todd C. Morrison (plaintiff), brings this writ of error, claiming that the defendant in error, the sentence review division of the Superior Court (defendant), improperly concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to sentence review pursuant to General Statutes § 51-1951 because he had entered into a plea agreement during his sentencing in 1984. We dismiss the writ of error.
The underlying facts and procedural history, taken from Morrison v. Parker, 261 Conn. 545, 804 A.2d 777 (2002), are pertinent to our resolution of the plaintiffs writ of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Cannavo Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. RyersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morrison v. Sentence Review Division of Superior CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. KnoxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020