Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Rome v. Fountain

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 18, 1984No. 55,477PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

2Per curiam

This is a consolidated appeal of two criminal cases in which defendants, James Fountain and Joseph P. O’Sullivan, III, were each charged with multiple counts of perjury (K.S.A. 21-3805). For purposes of this appeal, the facts are undisputed and essentially are as follows: On March 9, 1981, Richard J. Rome filed two criminal complaints in Reno County District Court against the defendants. At the time the complaints were filed, Fountain was the sheriff of Reno County, and O’Sullivan was the county attorney. The perjury charges were based upon statements…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. State v. CrozierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Foley v. HamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. State v. PruettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. State v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Droge v. RempelCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. RomeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. State v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  5. State v. BeerbowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API