Legal Opinion
Bennett v. LAPEROUSE AND SON, LTD.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 12, 2010No. 2009 CA 1099PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
| .This is an appeal of a judgment denying a motion to enforce a settlement agreement and for penalties. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and render.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This action originally arose out of the breach of a contract for services entered into between Jack Bennett and Laperouse and Son, Ltd. Jack Bennett filed a petition for damages against the company and its insurers, including Lloyds Underwriters at London (Lloyds). A mediation was eventually scheduled on September 17, 2008. Although Hurricane Gustav hit the Baton Rouge area on September…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Hart v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Sultana Corp. v. Jewelers Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- McClendon v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Joubert v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Phipps v. SchuppLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Norcold, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Roper v. LoupeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Norcold, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.