Legal Opinion

Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 7, 2005No. AC 25437Published

1Opinion of the Court

873 A.2d 1030 (2005)

89 Conn.App. 482

MIDDLESEX MUTUAL ASSURANCE COMPANY

v.

Brian VASZIL et al.

No. 25437.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued January 20, 2005.

Decided June 7, 2005.

Carl F. Yeich, Hartford, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Charles E. Hickey, Farmington, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

DRANGINIS, FLYNN and McLACHLAN, Js.

McLACHLAN, J.

The plaintiff, the Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants Brian Vaszil and Robert Vaszil.[1] The plaintiff brought this action in subrogation of its insured's…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. New Milford Savings Bank v. RoinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API