Legal Opinion

Standard Fur Cutting Co. v. Caledonian Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 6, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenman, J.

The complaint alleged and the defendant admitted that machinery, equipment, stock and other personal property contained in the plaintiff’s fur-cutting factory in Danbury, were insured under a policy issued by the defendant and that, on March 3d, 1927, practically all of the property was destroyed by fire. The defendant interposed several special defenses, one of which—the third—alleged breach of a provision in the policy requiring maintenance of watchman service in a specified manner. We confine our present attention to this defense, and recite only those of the facts found which pertain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glendale Woolen Co. v. Protection Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
  2. Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Hanover Fire Insurance v. GustinNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Dresser v. Hartford Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  5. Kelsey v. Universal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Morehouse v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. State v. OwensConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Relyea v. Pacific Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. v. El Rancho De Pancho LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API