Legal Opinion
Regents of the University of California v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, Health & Human Services Provider Reimbursement Review Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1996No. 94-56475PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Regents of the University of California (“Regents”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Regents’ action under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1), challenging the Secretary’s decision to deny Medicare reimbursement for patient expenses attributable to interest costs incurred on working loans from Regents to three University hospitals (“providers”).
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Regents owns and operates the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Trustees of Indiana University v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Tyler v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Palomar Medical Center v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Center for Biological Diversity v. KempthorneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- National Wildlife Federation Idaho Wildlife Federation Washington Wildlife Federation Sierra Club Trout Unlimited Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations Institute for Fisheries Resources Idaho Rivers United Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association Salmon for All Columbia Riverkeeper Nw Energy Coalition Federation of Fly Fishers American Rivers, Inc. Eastern Oregon Irrigators Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service United States Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Donald L. Evans, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Commerce Noaa Fisheries D. Robert Lohn, in His Official Capacity as Regional Direct of Noaa Fisheries, Northwest Irrigation Utilities Public Power Council Bpa Customer Group Franklin County Farm Bureau Federation Grant County Farm Board Federation Washington Farm Bureau Federation Clarkson Golf & Country Club State of Montana Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Defendant-Intervenors, and State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, State of Idaho, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. National Wildlife Federation Idaho Wildlife Federation Washington Wildlife Federation Sierra Club Trout Unlimited Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations Institute for Fisheries Resources Idaho Rivers United Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association Salmon for All Columbia Riverkeeper Nw Energy Coalition Federation of Fly Fishers American Rivers, Inc. Eastern Oregon Irrigators Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service United States Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, and Donald L. Evans, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Commerce Noaa Fisheries D. Robert Lohn, in His Official Capacity as Regional Director of Noaa Fisheries, Northwest Irrigation Utilities Public Power Council Bpa Customer Group Franklin County Farm Bureau Federation Grant County Farm Board Federation Washington Farm Bureau Federation State of Idaho Clarkson Golf & Country Club State of Montana Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, Defendant-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.