Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Cuomo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 15, 2000No. 99-16242PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
For the second time, this case is before us for the resolution of justiciability issues. Following remand from this court, the district court dismissed the action for the second time for lack of Article III standing. Plaintiffs, who are homeowners in *1128San Francisco’s Mission District (“Homeowners” or “plaintiffs”), again appeal.
Homeowners brought this action against defendants, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), the City and County of San Francisco (the “City”), Mission Housing Development Corporation (“Mission Housing”), and 1010 SVN…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Michael Schmier v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and Judicial Council of the Ninth CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cantrell v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C. v. Gray Davis, Governor of the State of California, and California Power Exchange CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.