Legal Opinion

Palomar Medical Center v. Kathleen Sebelius

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2012No. 10-56529PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a Medicare provider at first paid in full for certain medical services but later determined, through operation of the congressionally mandated Recovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”) program, to be liable to repay the government for these services found not to be medically reasonable and necessary. We must decide whether such a Medicare provider may in its appeal of the revised determination of overpayment challenge a lack of “good cause” for reopening the initial, erroneous determination.

Palomar Medical Center (“Palomar”) is a Medicare service…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sahara Health Care, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II, SecretaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Ronald Fournier v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Sunshine Haven Nursing Operations, LLC v. United States Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. St. Francis Hospital v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  5. University of Kansas Hospital Authority v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API