Legal Opinion

Heithoff v. Nebraska State Board of Education

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1988No. 87-276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

In an appeal under the Administrative Procedure Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 84-901 et seq. (Reissue 1981 & Cum. Supp. 1986), the district court for Lancaster County vacated the order or decision of the State Board of Education, which had terminated the teaching contracts of Katherine Heithoff and Jean Luedtke (teachers).

In an appeal from a judgment pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, the Supreme Court tries factual questions de novo on the record, which requires the Supreme Court to reach a conclusion independent of the trial court’s findings. Haeffner v. State, 220 Neb. 560, 371 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haeffner v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUB. INSTNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cunningham v. BrewerNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Irwin v. Board of Education of School District No. 25Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Van Fossen v. Board of GovernorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Jordan v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens of Kimball County, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ControlNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Maack v. School District of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Nucor Steel v. LeuenbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Nickel v. Saline County School District No. 163Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Percival v. Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API