Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Brewer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1944No. 31658PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

This action was commenced in the district court for Nemaha county by Matilda Cunningham, as plaintiff, to cancel a deed to William Homes Brewer, John James Brewer, and Edna May Brewer, defendants, to a certain tract of land located within the corporate limits of Auburn, Nebraska, on the ground that plaintiff was induced by fraud to execute the deed for an inadequate consideration. From a judgment in favor of the defendants and dismissing her petition, the plaintiff has appealed.

William Cunningham, husband of the plaintiff, filed a petition of intervention, to the same effect as the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Fitzgerald ex rel. Stockholders of the Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Bennett v. BennettNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Bonsal v. CampSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Valentine Oil Co. v. PowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Workman v. WorkmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. BURKE LUMBER & COAL COMPANY v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Dryden v. Omaha Steel WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Midwest Renewable Energy v. American Engr. TestingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API