Legal Opinion

Pingree v. Steere

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Montcalm. (Smith, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

A writ of replevin described the property to be replevied as follows:

“Sufficient of the boots and shoes now in the store or building situate on lot 182 of Moore’s plat of the village of Edmore, Montcalm county, Michigan, and now occupied by defendant herein, to satisfy the claim of the plaintiffs herein, as mortgagees of said goods, amounting to eight hundred and five dollars.”

The sheriff replevied a quantity of boots and shoes, caused an inventory and appraisal thereof to be made, and summoned the defendant, who entered a general appearance, by his attorney. The plaintiffs’ attorney filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sexton v. McDowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Farwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Wattles v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Kelso v. SaxtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dages v. Sanilac Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Dillon v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Cattermole v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API