Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 14, 1983No. 2 CA-CR 2655PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Hill and Lopp, the appellees in this case, were indicted for unlawful possession of stolen property after several stolen items were discovered in a search of their residence by police. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to suppress the physical evidence and statements obtained during the search. On motion by the state, the case was dismissed without prejudice pending the outcome of this appeal.

On August 26, 1981, the Pima County Attorney’s office received a report from a confidential informant that appellees were in possession of a stolen television set which had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Clifford v. Latta v. C. J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. State v. MontgomeryArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. State v. JeffersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CowansOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. CowansOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. VegaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. State v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API