Legal Opinion
State v. Clemons
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 29, 1976No. 1 CA-CR 1686PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
In this appeal from a determination of guilty of second degree burglary by the trial court, defendant makes the following assertions: (1) it was error to admit his tennis shoes into evidence, because they were discovered during a warrantless search of his mother’s apartment; and (2) it was error to admit his statements into evidence.
ADMISSION OF TENNIS SHOES
The search of a home conducted without a warrant issued upon probable cause is “per se unreasonable . . . subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions”. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tice v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- State v. StrayhandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. GreeneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- State v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.