Legal Opinion

United States v. Halbert

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1930No. 5922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs in these cases invoked the jurisdiction of the District Court on the ground that they were entitled to an allotment of lands in the Quinaieit Indian Reservation in the state of Washington, and that this right had been denied by the Secretary of the Interior. Congress has authorized such an action in such a case. 25 USCA § 345, 28 Stat. 305, § 1, 31 Stat. 760, § 1. Fifteen cases were consolidated for trial, and on appeal several of the cases, Indians whose claims were related, were joined, so that the number of allotments involved is greater than the number of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lemieux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Oakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Pape v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scholder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  4. United States ex rel. Charley v. McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. ProvoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API