Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Charley v. McGowan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 1933No. 6858PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Two actions were brought by the United States, as trustee and guardian of the Quinaielt and Quillehute Indians and particularly the three Indians named in the bill, George Charley, Mitchell Charley, and Roland Charley, to enforce the rights of these two tribes of Indians in certain fishing grounds at the mouth of the Columbia river.

The decision of the trial court was adverse to the contention of! the government. It is conceded on appeal that as to the Quillehute Indians the decree is right. The rights which the government seeks to enforce are those granted or reserved by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Seufert Bros. v. United States Ex Rel. Confederated Tribes & BandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Halbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Easton v. BrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  5. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  2. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1993
  3. Hyland v. Millers Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Collins v. FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. Bolander v. GodsilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API