Legal Opinion

Fruit of the Loom, Inc. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 5, 1996No. 95-1216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

In 1966 a predecessor to Fruit of the Loom sold assets to a purchaser that ultimately failed to pay $19 million. The loss justified a tax deduction. The problem here is that the IRS claims the company, due partly to procedural mishaps, was able to realize the full deduction twice, resulting in a “double counting.” We consider whether the Internal Revenue Service can invoke the mitigation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to collect additional taxes, from taxpayer to rectify this “double counting” by assessing a tax *1340deficiency which otherwise would be barred by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Michael G. O'Brien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  5. Brennen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James A. Pittman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Charles Reynolds and Beatrice Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Fruit Of The Loom, Incorporated v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Fong v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  5. Reynolds, Charles v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API