Legal Opinion

Fong v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 14, 1998No. Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 5217-96Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MUN LI FONG, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Fong v. Commissioner

Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 5217-96

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1998-181; 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 181; 75 T.C.M. (CCH) 2299;

May 14, 1998, Filed

Christian A. Speck, for respondent.

Belan Kirk Wagner, for petitioner.

SWIFT, JUDGE.

SWIFT

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SWIFT, JUDGE: This case is before the Court under Rule 121 1 on petitioner's motion for summary judgment.

As a matter of law, petitioner contends that respondent's notice of deficiency in income tax to petitioner for 1986 in the amount of $375,173 is barred by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. W. A. Rushlight, Raymond G. Rushlight, and W. A. Rushlight, of the Estate of Betty Rushlight, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Brennen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  4. United States v. Erma RosenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  5. Gooding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API