Legal Opinion

Michael G. O'Brien v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 28, 1985No. 84-1809PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court holding that the plaintiff taxpayer was entitled to a $7,367 (plus interest) refund of income taxes paid, notwithstanding the bar of the statute of limitations. Defendant United States argues that neither the mitigation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. §§ 1311-1314, nor the doctrine of equitable recoupment remove the limitations bar, 26 U.S.C. § 6511(a), to this refund suit. We agree, and for the reasons set forth below, reverse the district court’s judgment.

I

The parties do not dispute…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. CorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Estate of Frank Branson, Deceased Mary M. March v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Estate of Mueller v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. United States v. Commercial National Bank of Peoria, as of the Estate of Joseph G. O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Estate of Branson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API