Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kingsley v. Carterville Construction Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

— This is a suit by an employee of a subcontractor on the bond of an original road construction contractor. The cause was tried before the court without a jury. Plaintiff recovered and defendants appealed.

We shall refer to relator Kingsley as plaintiff. Defendant Carter-ville Construction Company in 1923 contracted with the state highway department to do certain work on state highway No. 14 in Lawrence county, and said construction company gave bond ‘as required by section 1040, Revised Statutes 1919. The construction company sublet to a firm styled Williams & Ward, and this firm employed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kansas City ex rel. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. YoumansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. City of St. Louis ex rel. Contracting & Supply Co. v. Hill-O'Meara Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Berger Manufacturing Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Berger Manufacturing Co. v. LloydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. City of St. Louis Ex Rel. Stone Creek Brick Co. v. Kaplan-McGowan Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Penn Lubric Oil Co. v. LyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Winebrenner v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Alexander Thomson, Inc. v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API