Legal Opinion

Alice Shilling Lapeze, and Hiram Shilling, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1988No. 87-3206PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWIN F. HUNTER, Jr., District Judge.

Alice Shilling Lapeze and Hiram Shilling appeal the district court’s dismissal of their suit to cancel a mineral lease held by Amoco Production Company, 655 F.Supp. 1 (1987). We affirm.

The basis of the plaintiffs’ claim is essentially set forth in Paragraph 20 of the petition, as follows:

“Because shut-in royalties and/or delay rentals were not paid to the petitioners in accordance with the terms of the Lease, the Lease was terminated.”

The objective facts are not in dispute. On March 3, 1976, appellants’ father, Eugene Shilling executed a mineral lease in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Davis v. LasterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  3. Jones v. Southern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Acquisitions, Inc. v. Frontier Explorations, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hanks v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Chastant v. Headrick Outdoor, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1995
  4. Danko Holdings, L.P. v. Exco Resources (Pa), LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API