Legal Opinion

Atlantic Refining Co. v. Shell Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 20, 1950No. 39192PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The Atlantic Refining Company, as assignee of a mineral lease executed by L. C. Furlow, dated January 30, 1943, instituted this suit to have a certain lease subsequently executed by Furlow in favor of S. Gordon Reese, dated April 4, 1946, declared null, and to have the validity of its lease recognized. In addition to Furlow and Reese as defendants to this proceeding, the Shell Oil Company, Inc., which had acquired a one-half interest in the mineral rights from Furlow by deed dated May 14, 1943, was also made a party defendant. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gloyd v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Jones v. Southern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  4. Le Rosen v. North Central Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Atlantic Refining CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Davis v. LasterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  3. Broussard v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1958
  4. Hibbert v. MuddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  5. Hanks v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API