Legal Opinion
Chastant v. Headrick Outdoor, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided February 15, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-1824Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAUMAN S. SCOTT, District Judge.
Trial of this matter was held before Judge Nauman S. Scott on December 2, 1994 in Lafayette, Louisiana. In this case we are called upon to determine whether the plaintiff, Leon Chastant (“Chastant”), is entitled to terminate two leases with Headrick Outdoor, Incorporated (“Headrick”). In the event we find that the leases are no longer valid, we are also asked to decide who owns the billboards that Headrick erected on those leases.
After considering the trial testimony and the record as a whole, we find that the plaintiff is entitled to terminate both…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Investor Inns, Inc. v. WallaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Beacham v. Hardy Outdoor AdvertisingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Alice Shilling Lapeze, and Hiram Shilling, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Porter v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.