Legal Opinion

Glastetter v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2001No. 00-3087, 00-3467PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Tina Glastetter suffered a stroke two weeks after she gave birth to her third child. She blamed her stroke on medication called Parlodel, which she had taken to suppress postpartum lactation. Glastet-ter sued Parlodel’s manufacturer, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, in federal court under a state-law products liability theory. The district court 2 excluded Glas-tetter’s expert medical testimony that Par-lodel caused her stroke, holding that it lacked scientific reliability. Glastetter v. Novartis Pharms. Corp., 107 F.Supp.2d 1015 (E.D.Mo.2000). Because the court’s ruling was fatal to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Mitchell v. Gencorp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Siharath v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Scott Johnson v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Schafersman v. Agland Coop.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Pamela Kuhn v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Carlson v. OkerstromNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Nelson v. Enid Medical Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API