Legal Opinion
Heidemann v. Rother
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1996No. Nos. 94-4112, 95-1136PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
This civil action was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Cherry Heidemann (hereinafter Cherry), a minor, along with her mother, June Heidemann, and Nebraska Advocacy Services, Inc. (collectively plaintiffs), alleging violations of Cherry’s constitutional rights to due process and equal protection and federal statutory rights under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (formerly the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA)). The case is presently on interlocutory appeal…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Chambers v. School District of Philadelphia Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Kate Frazier v. Fairhaven School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Diaz-Fonseca v. Commonwealth of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Nieves-Marquez v. Commonwealth of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- JOHN W. WALKER, — v. CITY OF PINE BLUFF, —Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.